I liked how the simulation used simple real-life scenarios (like the rule and the biscuits or the cat and the salmon) to explain complex legal reasoning concepts. It made the difference between literal and purposive interpretation easy to understand and engaging. The step-by-step structure and knowledge checks also helped reinforce learning and made the experience interactive and practical.

Aside from the fact that big companies basically do very difficult jobs, I think it's much more realistic than others and it's actually a simulation that teaches us the business of being a lawyer. Instead of showing us things we didn't know to our faces, he tried to learn and advance them from the basics. I think it was a simulation suitable for corporate life.

The program offered a thoughtful blend of legal reasoning and real-world ethical scenarios. I appreciated how it challenged me to balance literal rule interpretation with underlying purpose — a valuable skill for any legal professional. The interactive format made the concepts memorable and engaging.