I enjoyed the realistic engineering tasks and the opportunity to analyze propulsion system design decisions. The simulation improved my understanding of alternative fuels, bypass ratio, compression ratio, and engineering trade-offs. It was practical, engaging, and closely reflected real-world aerospace engineering work.

I liked that the simulation combined research, engineering calculations, and technical communication in a realistic aerospace design context. Comparing propulsion energy sources and evaluating bypass and compression ratio tradeoffs helped me better understand how performance, materials, emissions, installation constraints, and cost influence engineering decisions.

I liked that the simulation was realistic, interactive, and closely reflected real engineering tasks. It helped me understand how technical decisions are made by evaluating different energy sources and considering their impact on propulsion system design. The hands-on approach made the learning experience engaging and gave me a better understanding of the work done at GE Aerospace.