What I really enjoyed about this simulation was how effectively it bridges the gap between complex tax theory and practical, real-world data analysis. I was able to critically think of solutions, trial and error, and then compile my results and findings. It gave me a sense of work I would be doing in tax at KPMG.

I appreciated how the simulation provided a practical, real-world view of tax advisory work. It helped me understand how technical tax concepts are applied in business decisions, particularly in areas like state tax exposure and cross-functional services. The structured tasks also improved my analytical and problem-solving skills while reinforcing professional communication.

Working through the apportionment step is especially useful because it shows how a single driver—like sales in Pennsylvania relative to total sales—can materially change a company’s tax liability. That “single-factor” setup makes the relationship very direct, which is helpful for understanding how state tax systems work in practice.